Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Women in neurosurgery aim for recognition of merit, not tokenism: insights from an Italian survey.

Barbara Cappelletto, Rossella Rispoli, Paola Peretta, Laura Grazia Valentini, Debora Garozzo, Maurizio Fornari, Concetta Alafaci, Mathew E Diamond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara CappellettoSpine and Spinal Cord Surgery Unit, Department of Head, Neck, and Neurological Sciences, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Rossella RispoliSpine and Spinal Cord Surgery Unit, Department of Head, Neck, and Neurological Sciences, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Paola PerettaDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital (O.I.R.M.), Turin, Italy.
Laura Grazia ValentiniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Debora GarozzoMediclinic Parkview Hospital, Umm Al Suqueim Barsha South, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Maurizio FornariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital in Neurosurgery, Milan, Italy.
Concetta AlafaciNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Mathew E DiamondCognitive Neuroscience, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sparse representation of women in neurosurgery, compared to other medical fields, has driven debates about causes and remedies. This study explores gender disparities through a survey of female members of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch). Comprising 49 questions, the survey focused on career trajectories, work-life balance, mentorship, and perceptions of gender-related challenges. The respondents numbered 119, with 51% from 31 to 40 years old. Personal motivation emerged as the dominant driver for choosing neurosurgery. Mentorship was identified as a critical factor, with 69% perceiving benefits from having female mentors. Over half of respondents reported experiencing gender bias during residency and in the workplace. Many reported facing discouragement from peers and professors. A substantial proportion reported difficulty reconciling family responsibilities with professional duties, with 84% attributing lack of commitment to a relationship, and 49% attributing delayed motherhood, to professional demands. Respondents also expressed dissatisfaction with their visibility in scientific societies and conferences. As a remedy to hindrances of career progression, the majority of respondents do not envision female-centered initiatives (e.g., quotas in scientific societies, "women sections" or "pink rooms" at conferences). Instead, the respondents seek recognition based on merit. Rather than being categorized by their gender, the women surveyed advocate for a fair system where all individuals work on equal footing. Discussing these findings in the context of initiatives entailing quotas and enforced diversity, we argue that identity-based programs undermine core principles. Addressing underrepresentation in neurosurgery requires solutions that promote access and recognition for contributions irrespective of gender. Scientific associations have a fundamental responsibility in combating prejudice and enforcing measures to ensure the elimination of all forms of bias within neurosurgery.

Indexed as

female underrepresentationgender discriminationgender parityItalian surveyself-segregationwomen in neurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID40529890
PMCPMC12171119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.