ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Hidden figures underlying quality measures: revealing hidden racial inequalities in end-of-life cancer care delivery: a cohort study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing palliative care in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: identifying evidence gaps and future research priorities.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A Bayesian-driven approach to identify racial inequities in longitudinal care delivery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Calls for healthcare systems to reduce disparities in cancer care access and outcomes draw on comparisons of existing measures across race and ethnicity subgroups. This approach may hide inequities driven by systematic bias in the timing of care delivery. The goals of this study were to: (1) identify differences in the timing of care delivery between racial groups, and (2) determine whether these differences could be identified from quality measures. Methods: Retrospective decedent follow-back study of hospitals treating Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with advanced cancer aged 65-99 who died April-December 2016. Among hospitals serving at least 11 decedents of color (including Black or African-American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Other) and 11 White decedents, we calculated hospital-level differences between White decedents and decedents of color for 1) any use of palliative care and hospice (Measures) and 2) daily counts of palliative care and hospice use for each day in the 6 months before death (Signatures). Findings: The cohort included 30,319 decedents across 217 hospitals, of whom 7,852 (25.9%) were people of color (POC). The median of the hospital-specific aggregate measure difference was -5.35% (IQR = 12.83) for palliative care, indicating more POC received any palliative care, and 3.66% (IQR = 12.45) for hospice care, indicating more White people (WP) received any hospice care. We identified 5 high-level cluster-group descriptions of inequality from signatures. Inequality information from signatures matched those from measures in only 46.5% and 39.2% of hospitals for palliative and hospice care, respectively. Interpretation: Signatures incorporating timing of care delivery using longitudinal data revealed patterns of racial-ethnic inequalities in end-of-life cancer care otherwise missed by traditional aggregate quality measures. Funding: This work was supported by the American Cancer Society Award (RSG-22-128-01-HOPS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.