Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529816›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Effect of aspirin on small for gestational age neonates in pregnancies at high-risk for preeclampsia: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomised clinical trial.

Yunyu Chen, Long Nguyen-Hoang, Linh Thuy Dinh, Duy-Anh Nguyen, Ritsuko K Pooh, Arihiro Shiozaki, Mingming Zheng, Yali Hu, Runmei Ma, Aditya Kusuma and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03941886 (Implementation of First-trimester Screening and Prevention of Preeclampsia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03941886 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of First-trimester Screening and Prevention of Preeclampsia: a Stepped Wedge Cluster-randomized Trial in Asia

TypeinterventionalSponsorChiu Yee Liona PoonRan2019 to 2023Enrolled42,454ConditionsPre-EclampsiaArmsLow-dose aspirin in women with high risk of preeclampsia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Yunyu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Long Nguyen-HoangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Linh Thuy DinhHanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Duy-Anh NguyenHanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ritsuko K PoohCRIFM Prenatal Medical Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
Arihiro ShiozakiToyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Mingming ZhengNanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Yali HuNanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Runmei MaKunming Angel Women and Children's Hospital, Kunming, China.
Aditya KusumaHarapan Kita National Women and Children Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Tuangsit WataganaraFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahesh A ChoolaniYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Mayumi KanekoShowa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Suchaya LuewanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tung-Yao ChangDepartment of Fetal Medicine, Taiji Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan.
Noppadol ChaiyasitKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tongta NanthakomonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Yanmin JiangDepartment of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Steven W ShawTaipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wing Cheong LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ainaa Syazana MohamadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Malaysia.
Angela AguilarUniversity of the Philippines College of Medicine, The Philippine General Hospital, Manila, the Philippines.
So Ling LauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Nikki M W LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jiao LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Daljit S SahotaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Marc K C ChongThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ioannis PapastefanouDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Liona C PoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Data on the effect of 100-160 mg/day aspirin prophylaxis on small for gestational age neonates (SGA) in pregnancies at high-risk for preeclampsia (PE) is limited. We aimed to determine the impact of aspirin administration on the incidence of SGA. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial included 18 maternity/diagnostic units across ten Asian regions between 1st August 2019 and 28th February 2022. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At six-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transition from non-intervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women identified as high-risk for preterm-PE received aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks. Primary outcomes of the study were the delivery of an SGA neonate with birthweight <10th, <5th, or <3rd percentile for gestational age, adjusted for maternal weight and height, gravida, parity, ethnicity and newborn sex. The trial was registered with https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (Unique identifier: NCT03941886). Findings: 42,897/48,647 women accepted screening for preterm-PE. 10,294 (26.91%) and 27,965 (73.09%) women were included in the non-intervention and intervention phases, respectively. 2909/4688 (62.05%) high-risk women received aspirin in the trial. Pooling data from the whole trial demonstrated that aspirin was associated with increased rates of early-SGA <10th percentile (Relative risk, RR, 1.37, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.02 to 1.90). In the intervention phase, aspirin was associated with lower rates of SGA neonates with birthweight <3rd, <5th, and <10th percentile, delivered before 32 weeks (early-SGA; RR, 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.75, 0.38, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.70, 0.41, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.74 respectively) alongside a concurrent trend indicating an increased rate of late-SGA. Interpretation: Aspirin prophylaxis appears to be associated with a reduction in the rate of early-SGA and a simultaneous increase in the rate of late-SGA neonates born at or after 32 weeks. These findings underscore the importance of implementing the screen-and-prevent program for preterm-PE to reduce early-SGA, and emphasizing the heightened alert in follow-up to optimize the outcomes for late-SGA. Funding: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MOST 2021YFC2701604) and a start up grant from the Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Indexed as

AspirinPreeclampsiaPreventionScreeningSmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID40529816
PMCPMC12173081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.