ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
From genetic data to kinship clarity: employing machine learning for detecting incestuous relations.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to develop a predictive model based on STR profiles of mothers and children for the detection of incestuous conception. Methods: Based on allele frequency data from the USA and Saudi Arabia, STR profiles were generated and used to simulate offspring profiles corresponding to father-child and brother-sister incest scenarios. Model training and evaluation were performed using the STR profiles of the mother and child. In addition to the baseline model, we examined its performance under a one-step mutation model, as well as its ability to detect incestuous relationships based solely on the child's STR profile. Several machine learning algorithms and neural networks were tested for classification accuracy. Results: The CatBoost algorithm performed best in the binary classification of Normal Paternity vs. Incest Kinship. For the USA, we achieved the following results: 96.94% for 29 markers and 95% for 21 markers. The same accuracy was obtained with a single-step mutation, while prediction based on child profiles exclusively yielded an accuracy of 90.37% in the U.S. population. When analysing profiles from Saudi Arabia and modified Saudi frequencies, an accuracy of 94% was achieved. Discussion: It was established that population structure does not affect the model's accuracy and that it can be applied even in isolated populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.