Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529809›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

From genetic data to kinship clarity: employing machine learning for detecting incestuous relations.

Dejan Šorgić, Aleksandra Stefanović, Mladen Popović, Dušan Keckarević

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dejan ŠorgićDepartment of Paternity Identification, Biological and Other Traces, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Niš, Serbia.
Aleksandra StefanovićDepartment of Paternity Identification, Biological and Other Traces, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Niš, Serbia.
Mladen PopovićDepartment of English, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Dušan KeckarevićDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to develop a predictive model based on STR profiles of mothers and children for the detection of incestuous conception. Methods: Based on allele frequency data from the USA and Saudi Arabia, STR profiles were generated and used to simulate offspring profiles corresponding to father-child and brother-sister incest scenarios. Model training and evaluation were performed using the STR profiles of the mother and child. In addition to the baseline model, we examined its performance under a one-step mutation model, as well as its ability to detect incestuous relationships based solely on the child's STR profile. Several machine learning algorithms and neural networks were tested for classification accuracy. Results: The CatBoost algorithm performed best in the binary classification of Normal Paternity vs. Incest Kinship. For the USA, we achieved the following results: 96.94% for 29 markers and 95% for 21 markers. The same accuracy was obtained with a single-step mutation, while prediction based on child profiles exclusively yielded an accuracy of 90.37% in the U.S. population. When analysing profiles from Saudi Arabia and modified Saudi frequencies, an accuracy of 94% was achieved. Discussion: It was established that population structure does not affect the model's accuracy and that it can be applied even in isolated populations.

Indexed as

forensic geneticsincest detectionkinship analysismachine learningSTR profiling

Identifiers

PMID40529809
PMCPMC12171372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.