ReviewFrontiers in genetics2025
The clinical application and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: evaluating efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes in female infertility.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Review
- Impact of PGT Introduction on IVF Laboratory Workload: Lessons Learned from a Single-Center Experience of 5258 Biopsies over a 10-Year Period.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has rapidly advanced due to the significant development of genetic testing technologies. As an integration of genetic testing and assisted reproductive technology (ART), PGT plays a pivotal role in the primary prevention of birth defects, mainly chromosomal abnormalities and monogenic disease with known pathogenic variants. Blastocyst biopsy entails the collection of a relatively higher number of cells compared to other methods. Thereafter, whole genome amplification (WGA) generates a substantially larger amount of DNA templates, enabling more accurate subsequent genetic analyses. As an evolving technique that continues to be improved, the inherent limitations of WGA are expected to be minimized in the near future. Despite the widespread application of genetic techniques to WGA products, challenges remain in the downstream detection of small-fragment copy number variations (CNVs) (particularly those <1 Mb), the inability of long-read sequencing to resolve haplotypes or determine the position and orientation of micro-duplications for specific genomic sequences. Additionally, identifying complex or cryptic structures of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in prospective parents with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes represents an urgent and challenging task, which would facilitate the pre-testing evaluation of PGT indications. Meanwhile, further assessment of the risks associated with transferring embryos with mosaic chromosome abnormalities, the implantation potential of euploid embryos, as well as the long-term health outcomes of children born following PGT requires more rigorously designed studies to provide robust evidence. The technology of PGT will continue to evolve, becoming increasingly comprehensive and precise. However, this technology should be applied strictly in accordance with legislation and ethical guidelines, with the ultimate aim of benefiting couples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.