ArticleBiomedicine hub
Routine Use of Analgesia for Venipuncture in a Tertiary Level Neonatal Intensive Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal exposure to pain can lead to altered pain perception in later years of life. Despite the availability of measures to alleviate pain, routine use is lacking. We decided to conduct a quality improvement (QI) study to increase the use of analgesia during venipuncture, a common procedure in neonatal intensive care units, from a baseline of 0% to 50% over 8 weeks. Methods: Fishbone analysis was used to identify the potential barriers, which were targeted to bring improvement through Plan-Do-Study-Action (PDSA) cycles. In the first cycle, education and training of healthcare providers were conducted for 3 weeks, followed by the second cycle, wherein the mother's own milk was made available bedside for analgesia use. In the third cycle, a small amount of pasteurized donor human milk was kept separately for analgesia, and 25% dextrose was made available in the fourth cycle as a last resort. The 2nd-4th PDSA cycles were performed for a period of 2 weeks each. Results: The use of analgesia improved to 26% from baseline after the first cycle and subsequently to 46%, 50%, and 53% after the second, third, and fourth cycles, respectively. During the sustenance phase, in the initial 2 months, there was a decrease in analgesia use, but with prompt interventions and timely remediation, it increased up to 60%, which was sustained for the subsequent 3 months. Conclusion: Using the QI model, we were able to identify lacunae in current care and drive a culture change, leading to an increase in the use of analgesia during venipuncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.