ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2025
Pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Nanocarriers in psychiatry: a comprehensive review of emerging frontiers in the management of psychiatric disorders.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Prospective Development of a Whole-Brain Connectivity and Electric Field-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Atlas for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
- Choreographing time: toward therapy-aligned entactogens for complex PTSD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Psychological acupuncture for severe cynophobia with comorbid PTSD.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Designing a Mobile App for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: Insights From Lived Experience and Clinical Practice.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent mental illness with a high disability rate. The neurobiological abnormalities in PTSD suggest that drug therapy may have certain therapeutic effects. According to the recommendations of clinical guidelines for PTSD, the current clinical preference is for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Nevertheless, the efficacy of other types of drugs remains uncertain, which impacts the selection of personalized treatment for patients. Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of drugs with different pharmacological mechanisms in alleviating PTSD symptoms by comparing the response rates and dropout rates of different drug treatment groups in randomized clinical trials. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched and analyzed 52 reports that described the efficacy and acceptability of medication for PTSD. Among these, 49 trials used the dropout rate as an acceptability indicator, and 52 trials used the response rate as an efficacy indicator. Results: In the 49 trials with the dropout rate as the indicator, the dropout rate was 29% (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.33; Conclusion: Drug treatment is an effective rehabilitation method for PTSD patients, and individualized drug management should be considered. Trial registration: This systematic evaluation scheme has been registered with PROSPERO (protocol ID: CRD42023462662).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.