Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529797›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2025

Pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yanyan Jia, Zifeng Ye, Fude Yang, Jiabao Chai, Haiting Xu, Jingming Yang, Weiye Liang, Lili Wu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Choreographing time: toward therapy-aligned entactogens for complex PTSD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanyan JiaBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3852-798X
Zifeng YeDepartment of Medical Psychology of Hainan Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3368-6717
Fude YangBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5943-6271
Jiabao ChaiBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-2768
Haiting XuBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-2744
Jingming YangBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0898-4414
Weiye LiangBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, No. 7 Courtyard, Nandian North Road, Changping District, Beijing 100096, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8976-0855
Lili WuFaculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-6238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent mental illness with a high disability rate. The neurobiological abnormalities in PTSD suggest that drug therapy may have certain therapeutic effects. According to the recommendations of clinical guidelines for PTSD, the current clinical preference is for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Nevertheless, the efficacy of other types of drugs remains uncertain, which impacts the selection of personalized treatment for patients. Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of drugs with different pharmacological mechanisms in alleviating PTSD symptoms by comparing the response rates and dropout rates of different drug treatment groups in randomized clinical trials. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched and analyzed 52 reports that described the efficacy and acceptability of medication for PTSD. Among these, 49 trials used the dropout rate as an acceptability indicator, and 52 trials used the response rate as an efficacy indicator. Results: In the 49 trials with the dropout rate as the indicator, the dropout rate was 29% (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.33; Conclusion: Drug treatment is an effective rehabilitation method for PTSD patients, and individualized drug management should be considered. Trial registration: This systematic evaluation scheme has been registered with PROSPERO (protocol ID: CRD42023462662).

Indexed as

medicationpharmacotherapypost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)randomized controlled trial (RCT)treatment

Identifiers

PMID40529797
PMCPMC12171264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.