ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Long-term outcomes of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (mERAS) protocols in peri-operative management of minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidurals in esophagectomy: end of an era?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Electronic patient-reported outcomes for outpatient care after non-intubated thoracic surgery in early-stage lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs consist of multimodal, evidence-based protocols implemented during the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods to reduce perioperative stress, minimize complications, accelerate recovery, and shorten hospital stays. While ERAS has been associated with improved long-term outcomes in gastric, colon, and rectal cancers, its impact on the long-term prognosis of esophageal cancer remains unclear due to limited high-volume studies. Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 230 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy between June 1, 2017 and March 30, 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: the mERAS group, managed according to modified ERAS (mERAS) protocols, and the standard care (SC) group, receiving standard perioperative care. Postoperative outcomes, including morbidity, functional recovery, and hospital stay length, were compared between the groups. Additionally, the influence of mERAS protocols on long-term survival was assessed, particularly in patients with significant preoperative weight loss. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for a higher prevalence of cardiac disease or hypertension in the mERAS group (25.0% Conclusions: mERAS protocols improve recovery and reduce complications in esophageal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, with survival benefits in those with significant preoperative weight loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.