ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Knowledge, belief, and practice in prevention of lymphedema in postoperative breast cancer patients and analysis of associated factors.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient personas of delayed healthcare-seeking behavior among patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Tailored personas for self-management in home-based rehabilitation for participants with lower limb lymphedema: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Structural equation modeling of factors influencing preventive intention for postoperative breast cancer-related lymphedema: based on health action process approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable stacking-based risk model for breast cancer- related lymphoedema: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the knowledge-belief-practice (KBP) regarding lymphedema prevention among postoperative breast cancer patients and identify its psychosocial determinants. Methods: Postoperative patients were selected using a convenience sampling method. A general information collection, questionnaires, a Chinese version of the Distress Disclosure Index (DDI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used. Multivariate linear regression was used. Results: The total scoring rate of knowledge, belief, and practice was 58.51%, with the lowest for knowledge and highest for belief. The level of knowledge, belief, and practice was positively correlated with self-representation and negatively with anxiety and depression. The multivariate linear regression showed that receiving health education on the knowledge, family income, anxiety, depression, and self-expression levels were the critical factors influencing lymphedema. Conclusion: The level of knowledge, belief, and practice is at the lower-to-middle level in China, with poor knowledge mastery, and the level of practice needs to be improved. Healthcare personnel should conduct health education to improve patients' knowledge level related to lymphedema and enhance the correct health beliefs of the patients. Meanwhile, they should also pay attention to their psychological health status to help them improve the level of self-expression and carry out personalized interventions according to the influencing factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.