ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Generative AI cybersecurity and resilience.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Agentic AI Framework (AAIF): a policy-enforced architecture for accountable and high-performance intrusion detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence adoption and corporate ESG performance: evidence from a refined large language model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence marks a critical inflection point in the evolution of machine learning systems, enabling the autonomous synthesis of content across text, image, audio, and biomedical domains. While these capabilities are advancing at pace, their deployment raises profound ethical, security, and privacy concerns that remain inadequately addressed by existing governance mechanisms. This study undertakes a systematic inquiry into these challenges, combining a PRISMA-guided literature review with thematic and quantitative analyses to interrogate the socio-technical implications of generative Artificial Intelligence. The article develops an integrated theoretical framework, grounded in established models of technology adoption, cybersecurity resilience, and normative governance. Structured across five lifecycle stages (design, implementation, monitoring, compliance, and feedback) the framework offers a practical schema for evaluating and guiding responsible AI deployment. The analysis reveals a disconnection between the fast adoption of generative systems and the maturity of institutional safeguards, resulting with new risks from the shadow Artificial Intelligence, and underscoring the need for adaptive, sector-specific governance. This study offers a coherent pathway towards ethically aligned and secure application of Artificial Intelligence in national critical infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.