Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529534›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Surgical Technique, Tips, and Tricks: Medial Implantable Shock Absorber for Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis.

Andrew S Bi, Wendell W Cole, Dylan Lowe, Alexander Golant, Laith M Jazrawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Implantable Shock Absorber: Breakthrough or Hype?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew S BiNYU Langone Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1703-6232
Wendell W ColeNYU Langone Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6588-7154
Dylan LoweNYU Langone Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5611-8601
Alexander GolantNYU Langone Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA.
Laith M JazrawiNYU Langone Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) presents a challenging problem to treat for knee surgeons, with a multitude of options from conservative management, including injections and unloader braces, meniscal procedures, osteotomies, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). A new medial implantable shock absorber (MISHA) allows for offloading 142 N of the medial compartment during stance phase of gait. Indications: US Food and Drug Administration approval was obtained on April 10, 2023, with the following indications: isolated medial knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-IV) that failed 6 months of conservative management, ages 25 to 65 years, body mass index <35 or body weight <300 lbs, <15° of varus, no flexion contracture >10°, and no significant medial osteophytes or medial meniscal extrusion. Technique Description: A longitudinal medial knee incision is made 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle to the pes insertion, around 3 cm medial to the tibial tubercle, exposing the superficial medial collateral ligament, and medial joint line. The establishment of the femoral anisometric point is critical to provide a 4-mm posterior condylar offset in 90° of flexion compared to full extension. A trial implant can be placed to confirm appropriate anisometry, implant loading in extension, and relaxation in flexion. The final implant is placed and the titanium femoral and tibial baseplates are fixed with 3 unicortical titanium locking screws each. Results: Expected results per recommended postoperative protocol are immediate weightbearing without range of motion restrictions. From author experience, patients typically feel improvement and return to sport more rapidly than with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Recovery and return to work are faster than osteotomies or UKAs based on comparative short-term studies. While long-term results are lacking given the novelty of the procedure, prospective studies have demonstrated 100% arthroplasty-free survival at 2 years and 85% survival at 5 years. Discussion/Conclusion: The MISHA is a viable option for isolated medial compartment knee OA that provides a joint-preserving alternative to arthroplasty and a less morbid alternative to osteotomy. This treatment can be technically difficult to perform, but several pearls and techniques can offer a reproducible, minimally invasive surgery and good functional results. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

cartilageknee preservationmedial knee osteoarthritisMISHAosteotomy

Identifiers

PMID40529534
PMCPMC12171064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.