ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Identification of compounds to promote diabetic wound healing based on transcriptome signature.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilayer tri-dermal-network hydrogel for sequential delivery of PD-168077 in multimodal diabetic wound regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Editorial: Prevention and treatment of skin diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Diabetic wounds are characterized by delayed healing, and the resulting diabetic foot ulcer may lead to severe complications, including amputations and mortality. This study aimed to identify potential small molecule drug candidates that can enhance diabetic wound healing through integrating transcriptome signature and experimental validation strategies. Method: Gene expression dataset (GSE147890) from a diabetic skin humanized mice model in the Gene Expression Omnibus database was analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes between diabetic and normal skin, as well as the wound edge at 24 h. The DEGs were integrated with wound-related genes from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database to construct a diabetes-specific wound gene profile. Then, the expression signatures were analyzed using the ClusterProfiler package in R for Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses. Hub genes were identified through the String database and Cytoscope software. The Connectivity Map (CMap) was employed to predict compounds with potential therapeutic effects on diabetic wound healing. These predications were validated through Results: A total of 167 DEGs were identified between diabetic and normal wounds, with significant enrichment in biological processes related to the extracellular matrix and collagen. The top ten hub genes were predominantly associated with collagen synthesis and inflammatory responses. CMap analysis identified 12 small-molecule compounds, top four of which were further investigated. Conclusion: This study highlights the altered expression profiles associated with delayed diabetic wound healing, including reduced inflammation and collagen production. Further drug screening identified compound CG-930 as a novel therapeutic agent with significant potential to promote wound healing in diabetic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.