Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529492›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Key regulatory challenges in developing modified new chemical drugs in China: a national survey study.

Lixia Fu, Guoshu Jia, Minji Wei, Yimin Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lixia FuInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guoshu JiaInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Minji WeiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yimin CuiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: With the increasing number of modified new chemical drugs (MNCDs) entering the market or in the approval pipeline in China, understanding their current status is crucial. This study aims to present stakeholders' perspectives on the R&D and regulatory challenges associated with MNCDs. Methods: A nationwide online survey was conducted to collect perspectives from industrial stakeholders involved in drug R&D, drug manufacturing, and contract research organizations (CROs) and other related fields. A web-based questionnaire link was distributed to pharmaceutical professionals via the social media platform "WeChat". Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 362 participants from 178 organizations across 19 provinces in China were recruited. Half of the respondents had over 10 years of work experience, 66% held intermediate or higher professional titles, and over 90% were experienced in R&D or regulatory submissions. Most respondents identified clinical advantage evaluation as the primary regulatory hurdle, with the lack of clear guidance and case references cited as significant impediments in the R&D and marketing application of MNCDs. Furthermore, clinical trial efficacy and safety data were identified as the main factors influencing the successful market launch of MNCDs, with expert consultation being the predominant method for assessing clinical advantages. Conclusion: Despite the issuance of several guidance for MNCDs, the industry still faces regulatory challenges in assessing the clinical advantages of these drugs. Additionally, there is a need for more objective and clear guidance in the R&D of modified new drugs. These findings are critical for regulators to refine the regulatory framework of MNCDs.

Indexed as

clinical advantagemodified new drugregulatory challengeregulatory sciencesurvey

Identifiers

PMID40529492
PMCPMC12170327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.