ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Perceptions and experiences of generative artificial intelligence training to support research for Chinese nurses: A qualitative focus group study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Registered nurses' experiences with generative artificial intelligence: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Nurses' and Nursing Students' Experiences With Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational and Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Potential and Practice: An Integrative Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2026Review
- Inclusive Leadership, Psychological Safety, AI Readiness, and Nurses' AI Literacy: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Clinical nurses as digital guardians: unlocking the key determinants of digital resilience in the AI era.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mapping applications and evaluations of LLM-enabled AI chatbots for health purposes: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mapping research trends and competency domains in nursing-related digital and artificial intelligence technologies: A bibliometric analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Review
- Nursing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Retrieval augmented generation for nursing question answering with large language models.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Large language model-driven agents in nursing practice: A scoping review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Development of a large language model-based knowledge graph for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer and its implications for nursing.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Navigating Society 5.0: Integrating Strength-Based Leadership and Job Crafting for Improved Nursing Outcomes.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Nurses' clinical research activities have contributed to optimizing the care process and improving patient outcomes, and generative artificial intelligence (GAI) may help clinical nurses strengthen their research skills. To support research, this study aimed to explore the Chinese nurses' perceptions and experiences of GAI training. Methods: This study used a descriptive qualitative design. The China Nurses Network conducted a three-day training session on "GAI for Nursing Research" theme, we selected 23 nurses by a convenience sampling method among participating in the training. The researchers conducted three focus group interviews at the end of each day. All focus groups were interviewed face-to-face to facilitate interaction, data collection, and observation. The data were analyzed using conventional content analysis and coded manually. Results: The results showed that nurses' use of GAI to support scientific research was dynamic and characterized by evolving perceptions and practices. Four themes and 11 sub-themes emerged from the analysis: 1) utilization efficacy: cope with research ability, affected by many factors; 2) booster research: growth and challenges go hand in hand; 3) role reversal: from GAI-dominated to nurse-dominated; 4) beautiful dream: more features on research, more assistants on clinical care. Conclusions: The effectiveness of GAI in supporting clinical nurses in conducting research is mainly limited by differences in personal research literacy, lack of ethical regulation, and information accuracy. In the future, it is necessary to improve nurses' relevant skills through specialized training and promote the standardization of technical regulations to ensure the appropriate application of GAI in nursing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.