Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529459›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025

Navigating the integration of artificial intelligence in Nursing: Opportunities, challenges, and strategic actions.

Rick Yiu Cho Kwan, Anson Chui Yan Tang, Janet Yuen Ha Wong, Wentao Zhou, Maria Theresa Belcina, Gracielle Ruth Adajar, Misae Ito, Irvin Ong, Younhee Kang, Jing Jing Su and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Large language model-driven agents in nursing practice: A scoping review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rick Yiu Cho KwanPi Iota At-large Chapter, Sigma Asia, Hong Kong, China.
Anson Chui Yan TangPi Iota At-large Chapter, Sigma Asia, Hong Kong, China.
Janet Yuen Ha WongPi Iota At-large Chapter, Sigma Asia, Hong Kong, China.
Wentao ZhouUpsilon Eta Chapter, Sigma Asia, Pasir Panjang, Singapore.
Maria Theresa BelcinaPsi Beta Chapter, Sigma Asia, Dumaguete, Philippines.
Gracielle Ruth AdajarAlpha Alpha Phi Chapter, Sigma Asia, Manila, Philippines.
Misae ItoTau Nu Chapter, Sigma Asia, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Irvin OngPhi Gamma Chapter (Virtual), Sigma Theta Tau International, Indianapolis, USA.
Younhee KangLambda Alpha At-large Chapter, Sigma Asia, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jing Jing SuSchool of Nursing, Tung Wah College, Hong Kong, China.
Julia Sze Wing WongPi Iota At-large Chapter, Sigma Asia, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years has brought about transformative changes across various sectors, including healthcare. In nursing practice, education, and research, AI has the potential to revolutionize traditional methodologies, enhance learning experiences, and improve patient outcomes. Integrating AI tools and techniques can provide clinicians with smarter clinical solutions and nursing students with more robust and interactive learning environments, while also advancing research capabilities in the field. Despite the promising prospects, the incorporation of AI into nursing practice, education, and research presents several challenges. Firstly, there is a concern about the potential displacement of human roles in nursing due to automation, which may affect the human-centric nature of nursing care. Secondly, there are issues related to the lag in AI competency among nurses. Many current nursing curricula do not include comprehensive AI training, leading to a lack of preparedness in utilizing these technologies effectively. Lastly, the ethical implications of AI in healthcare, such as data privacy, patient consent, and the potential for biased algorithms, need to be meticulously addressed. To harness the full potential of AI in nursing practice, education, and research, several strategic actions including reinvesting in humanistic practice, revising core competencies and curriculum, and developing new ethical guidelines.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChallengeCompetencyEducationEthicsNursing

Identifiers

PMID40529459
PMCPMC12168454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.