ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Gel card kit to detect recent homologous blood transfusion for anti-doping purpose. A proof of concept and assessment of limitations.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Annual Banned-Substance Review 18th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2024/2025.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Homologous blood transfusion (HBT) is used illicitly by some athletes to increase red blood cell (RBC) mass. The cytofluorometric techinique detects HBT by distinguishing between two different RBC populations. Although effective, this method is costly and time-consuming. Gel card kits (ID-Card, BioRad), which are widely used in clinical practice, offer faster and more cost-effective alternative. This study evaluates the ability of Gel cards to differentiate between two RBC populations, when compared with cytofluorometry. Blood samples from volunteers were phenotyped for minor antigens (C, c, E, e, K, k, Jka, Jkb, Fya, Fyb, S and s) using flow cytometry. Non-compatible blood samples, differing in minor antigens groups, were mixed in different proportions (10%, 5% and 3% of donor blood). Gel cards were able to detect 5% of the minor population when the donor expressed C, c, E and e antigens. The limit of detection for K, Jka and Jkb antigens is 3%. However, Gel cards were not able to detect double RBC population when the donor expressed these antigens. Similarly, Gel cards could not distinguish between two RBC populations differing in Fya, Fyb, S and s expression, as the antigen-positive cells were not concentrated at the top of the Gel but were instead dispersed throughout it. Further studies are required to evaluate the ability of Gel cards to detect other antigens (e.g., M, N, P1, Le
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.