ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Intraindividual variability of von Willebrand factor and the need for repeated testing.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time to integrate measurement uncertainty in method comparison and interpretation of hemostasis laboratory assays.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing von Willebrand disease (VWD) is complicated by intraindividual variation of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Current guidelines define VWD as VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) or VWF activity of <0.30 or <0.50 × 10 Objectives: This study aimed to examine the intraindividual variation of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), platelet-binding activity (VWF:GPIbR), and collagen-binding activity (VWF:CB) by use of routine patient data and to define cutoffs for reliably excluding VWD based on a single sample. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we extracted patient results of VWF:Ag, VWF:GPIbR, and VWF:CB analyzed at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, from January 2013 to January 2024 and calculated total and nonanalytical coefficient of variation (CV Results: We found a CV Conclusion: We found considerable intraindividual VWF variation in patients referred for VWF testing. Our results confirm that repeated testing is crucial when VWF is low in the normal range to prevent false rejection of a true VWD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.