ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Shape and Size Adaptations of Planthoppers Along an Altitudinal Gradient on Mount Wilhelm (Papua New Guinea).
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mountains are an ideal context to study species community and adaptation in relation to environmental changes such as temperature and vegetation profile. Such changes produce different ecological niches that can be a source of local adaptations in the communities, like body size varying with elevation, for example. In this context, planthoppers (Insects, Hempitera, Fulgoromorpha) community and their species traits were studied along an altitudinal gradient in Mount Wilhelm (Papua New Guinea) to test niche and morphological trait conservatism in relation to environmental filtering. Niche conservatism is significant at high altitude for Cixiidae, and forewing shape is conserved. This is not the case for Achilidae and Derbidae, for which forewing shape is not conserved and forewing relative length increases in size with altitude. These variations in size and shape translate an adaptation of Achilidae and Derbidae to high altitudes; while closely related species of Cixiidae tend to keep the same ecological niche, and then, forewing size and shape are maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.