Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529331›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Where and What Kind-A Better Understanding of Local and Landscape Features in Planning the Urban Flower Meadows for Supporting Bee Communities.

Agata Kostro-Ambroziak, Anna Sobieraj-Betlińska, Piotr Szefer, Urszula Suprunowicz, Bartosz Ulaszewski, Artur Pliszko, Justyna Burzyńska, Beata Charubin, Karolina Wróbel, Karolina Mierzyńska and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Agata Kostro-AmbroziakDepartment of Zoology and Genetics, Faculty of Biology University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-2985
Anna Sobieraj-BetlińskaDepartment of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz Bydgoszcz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4177-0119
Piotr SzeferFaculty of Science University of South Bohemia Ceské Budejovice Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-2516
Urszula SuprunowiczFaculty of Biology, The Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-7414
Bartosz UlaszewskiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz Bydgoszcz Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2981-1205
Artur PliszkoDepartment of Taxonomy, Phytogeography and Palaeobotany, Institute of Botany Jagiellonian University Kraków Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3620-6695
Justyna BurzyńskaDepartment of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.
Beata CharubinFaculty of Biology, The Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7420-9395
Karolina WróbelFaculty of Biology, The Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3610-8956
Karolina MierzyńskaFaculty of Biology, The Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0759-0132
Daniel KozikowskiFaculty of Biology, The Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5303-8684
Edyta JermakowiczDepartment of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology University of Bialystok Białystok Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-0366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cities are growing ecosystems in the modern world. Due to their heterogeneity, urban areas have multifaceted influences on organisms, including bees. However, in many specific city greenspace designs and management implementations, our understanding of their functionality remains limited. This is also true for urban flower meadows (UFMs). We extensively examined UFMs in three large cities to answer the following question: What features of UFMs and their surroundings (urban matrix) are the most important in supporting bees in cities? Our multifaceted approach revealed that the mosaics of habitats surrounding UFMs are at least as necessary to support bees as the local features of UFMs. An abundance of bees responded positively to the number of flowering units and the blue and yellow colors of flowers, and increased cover of industrial areas, green urban areas, and pastures in a 100-m buffer. Increasing the cover of the continuous urban fabric in all buffer zones (100, 300, and 500 m) positively affected bee species richness and abundance. Due to the lack of design guidelines for urban flower meadows, our results are helpful for the further planning of UFMs to optimize bee-friendly areas in urban landscapes.

Indexed as

designed landscapespollinatorsurban ecologyurban ecosystemsurban greenspaces

Identifiers

PMID40529331
PMCPMC12171940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.