Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529301›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2025

A gene expression-based approach for the precision use of hydrocortisone in septic shock patients; a secondary analysis of the ADRENAL trial.

Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Diego Ariel Rey, David M Evans, Lijing Yao, Simon Finfer, Rinaldo Bellomo, Tiago Chedraoui Silva, Jeremy Cohen, Yu Qiu, Wellington Dos Reis Lucena and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Honouring Rinaldo Bellomo's tour de force in sepsis research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Balasubramanian VenkateshThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Diego Ariel ReyResearch Department, Endpoint Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
David M EvansUniversity of Queensland, Australia.
Lijing YaoResearch Department, Endpoint Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Simon FinferThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoAustin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Tiago Chedraoui SilvaResearch Department, Endpoint Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeremy CohenThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Yu QiuResearch Department, Endpoint Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Wellington Dos Reis LucenaResearch Department, Endpoint Health Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Naomi HammondThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
John MyburghThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Qiang LiThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Lucas Petri DamianiHCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anthony DevauxThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Rodrigo Octavio DeliberatoThe Translational Health Intelligence and Knowledge (THINK) Lab, Department of Biostatistics, Health Informatics and Data Science, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Small observational studies suggest the effect of corticosteroids in patients with vasodilatory shock vary depending on endotypes determined by gene expression. We sought to replicate these findings in a larger cohort from a randomised clinical trial. Methods: In a cross-sectional substudy of the Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy In Septic Shock (ADRENAL) trial, patients were classified as one of two immune endotypes using predefined gene expression signatures: immune adaptive-prevalent (IA-P) or immune innate-prevalent (IN-P). We compared the outcomes of the two endotypes using a Bayesian analysis. The primary outcome was Day-28 mortality. Findings: Of 540 patients, 267 (49.4%) were classified as IA-P and 273 (50.6%) as IN-P. In a Bayesian analysis using noninformative priors, there was no difference in the effect of hydrocortisone on 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% credible intervals [CrI] 0.72-2.87) and OR 1.39, 95% CrI 0.74-2.61, between the IA-P and IN-P groups, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with more severe shock (n = 215/540, 40%), the corresponding figures for IA-P and IN-P were 1.21, 95% CrI (0.31-4.74) and OR 0.72 (95% CrI 0.30-1.67), respectively. In the subgroup of patients with pulmonary sepsis (232/540, 43%), IA-P patients treated with hydrocortisone had increased mortality (OR 5.55, 95% CrI 1.81-21.2). Interpretation: Gene expression data from patients with septic shock reveal distinct immune endotypes. There was no evidence of a heterogeneity of treatment effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in the 2 endotypes or in the subgroup with severe shock. Patients with the IA-P endotype and pulmonary sepsis appear to be harmed by corticosteroids.

Indexed as

CorticosteroidsEndotypesRNA-SeqSeptic shockTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40529301
PMCPMC12173105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.