ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Harmonization of diffusion MRI on healthy subjects using NeuroCombat and LongCombat: a B-Q MINDED brain intra- and inter-scanner study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlations between white matter hyperintensities, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and cognition in the oldest old: a multimodal cross-sectional study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in stroke: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structural integrity of brain white matter is commonly assessed using quantitative diffusion metric maps derived from diffusion MRI (dMRI) data. However, in multi-site, multi-scanner studies, variability across and within scanners presents challenges in ensuring consistent and comparable diffusion evaluations. This study assesses the effectiveness of ComBat-based harmonization algorithms in reducing intra- and inter-scanner variability in diffusion metrics such as FA, MD, AD, RD, MK, AK, and RK. Utilizing the B-Q MINDED dataset, which includes anatomical and dMRI data from 38 healthy adults scanned twice on two 3T MRI scanners (Siemens Healthineers PrismaFit and Siemens Healthineers Skyra) on the same day, we evaluated the NeuroCombat and LongCombat algorithms for harmonizing diffusion metrics. These harmonization methods effectively minimized both intra- and inter-scanner variability, highlighting their potential to improve consistency in multi-scanner diffusion analysis. Our findings suggest that NeuroCombat and LongCombat are recommended for harmonizing dMRI metric maps in clinical studies. Additionally, both algorithms applied in either ROI-based or voxel-wise configurations, significantly reduced variability, achieving levels comparable to scan-rescan variability intra-scanner. Nonetheless, the choice of harmonization algorithm and implementation should be tailored to the research question at hand. Moreover, the significant intra- and inter-subject variability on non-harmonized diffusion data demonstrated in this study reinforces the importance of harmonization strategies that address any sources of variability. By minimizing scanner-specific biases, the NeuroCombat and LongCombat harmonization algorithms enhance the reliability of diffusion biomarkers, enabling large-scale studies and more informed clinical decision-making in brain-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.