Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40529237›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Recent progress in surgical treatment of cervical spine myelopathy - A narrative review.

Jun Ouchida, Hiroaki Nakashima, Sadayuki Ito, Naoki Segi, Ippei Yamauchi, Shiro Imagama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun OuchidaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroaki NakashimaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Sadayuki ItoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoki SegiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ippei YamauchiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Shiro ImagamaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical techniques and technology for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) have demonstrated remarkable advancement during the past decade. This narrative review examines the evolution of surgical approaches and technological innovations, focusing on both anterior and posterior techniques. Anterior approaches have progressed through the development of endoscopic procedures, novel decompression methods such as vertebral body sliding osteotomy, and advanced implant materials including 3D-printed customized devices. Posterior approaches have evolved with the integration of endoscopic techniques and refined fixation methods, demonstrating reduced tissue trauma and improved outcomes. The integration of surgical assistance technologies, including navigation systems, robotics, and augmented reality, has enhanced surgical precision while potentially reducing procedural risks. While these advances show promising outcomes in terms of surgical precision and patient recovery, challenges persist regarding technology implementation and cost-effectiveness. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence for surgical planning, patient-specific implants, and adjunctive biological therapies may further improve CSM treatment. The optimal application of these innovations requires continued research and careful evaluation to establish their long-term efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID40529237
PMCPMC12167779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.