ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Research progress of deubiquitinating enzymes in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deubiquitinases as Regulators and Therapeutic Targets in Vascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Roles of ubiquitin‑specific peptidase 22 in cellular fate: From embryonic survival to tissue repair, inflammation and metabolism (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The research landscape of ferroptosis in ischemic stroke: a bibliometric analysis of the literature from 2017 to 2025 based on the WOS and PubMed databases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Roles of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury: mechanisms and promising therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI) is a critical pathological process driving neurological deterioration following ischemic stroke, involving multifaceted mechanisms such as inflammatory cascades, oxidative stress, and programmed cell death (PCD). Deubiquitinases (DUBs), as key regulators of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, dynamically modulate protein stability, signal transduction, and subcellular localization through editing the ubiquitin code, exhibiting dual roles in CIRI-both as drivers of pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets. This review systematically elucidates the core regulatory mechanisms of DUBs in CIRI: (i) suppression of neuroinflammation via modulation of NLRP6/NF-κB pathways; (ii) mitigation of oxidative stress through the KEAP1-NRF2 axis and mitochondrial quality control; and (iii) neuroprotection by intercepting necroptosis, ferroptosis, and other PCD pathways. We further reveal that CIRI disrupts DUBs functionality through a tripartite mechanism-transcriptional dysregulation, catalytic inactivation, and subcellular mislocalization-transforming DUBs from guardians of homeostasis into mediators of injury. Consequently, DUBs-targeted strategies, including small-molecule inhibitors (e.g., IU1, Vialinin A), genetic editing approaches (e.g., BRCC3 silencing, A20 overexpression), and exosome-based delivery systems (e.g., the KLF3-AS1/miR-206/USP22 axis), demonstrate significant neuroprotective potential. However, challenges persist, such as substrate specificity, ubiquitin chain-type dependency, and barriers to clinical translation. Future research must integrate multi-omics technologies, develop brain-targeted delivery platforms, and explore synergistic effects of DUBs modulation with existing therapies to advance precision medicine in stroke treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.