ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2025
The inquiry of the learning support index connotation of adults with autism spectrum disorder.
Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a questionnaire survey using the Delphi Technique was conducted among 22 expert group members. We construct the connotation of learning support indicators for adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) based on survey results. In this study, there are five levels of significance. After three rounds of questionnaire surveying, the average of all questions was >4.0, with a standard deviation of <1, and 37 questions were reserved. The average opinion of the expert members of the Delphi Technique on the importance of connotation topics increased and the standard deviation decreased sequentially, yielding the result of opinion convergence, indicating that the expert members agreed on the importance of the topic of the survey. The research results indicate that the connotation question is reduced from 52 questions to 37 questions through three aspects: writing and expression, simplification and merging of questions, and consideration criteria for various score indicators of the question. On a theoretical level, this study is expected to provide a reference for the connotation construction of learning support indicators for adults with ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.