ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Wearable sensors-based assistive technologies for patient health monitoring.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Time Foot Height Estimation and Activity Classification Using a Foot-Mounted IMU Implemented on a Smartphone.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advancement of handheld devices, patient health monitoring using wearable devices plays a vital role in overall health monitoring. Methods: In this article, we have integrated multi-model bio-signals to monitor patient health data during daily life activities continuously. Two well-known datasets from ScientISST MOVE and mHealth have been analyzed. The purpose of this study is to explore the possibilities of using advanced bio-signals for monitoring patient vital signs during daily life activities and predicting favorable and more accurate health-related solutions based on current body health-related real-time measurements. Results: With the help of machine learning algorithms, we have observed classification accuracy of up to 94.67% using the mHealth dataset and 95.12% on the ScientISST MOVE dataset. Other performance indicators, such as recall, precision, and F1 score, also performed well. Discussion: Overall, integrating a machine learning model with bio-signals provides an enhanced ability to interpret complex real-time patient health monitoring for personalized care and overall smart healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.