ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Exploring the growth and impact of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric study from 2004 to 2024.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Risk Prediction in Anesthesiology: A Bibliometric and Knowledge-Mapping Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- From prediction to practice: closing the translation gap in artificial intelligence for anesthesia.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Surgical Intensity and Specialization Preferences in Healthcare: An Operation- and Process-Management Perspective Using Bibliometric Analysis, Cognitive Mapping and Analytic Network Process (ANP).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in anesthesiology is revolutionizing clinical practice by enhancing patient monitoring, improving risk assessment, and enabling personalized anesthetic care. This bibliometric analysis aims to evaluate publication trends, key contributors, and emerging translational pathways in AI research in anesthesiology, with special emphasis on clinical relevance, thematic clustering, and future application prospects. Materials and methods: Publications related to AI in anesthesiology from 2004 to 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database, resulting in 658 articles. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were employed for the bibliometric analysis. Results: AI research in anesthesiology has experienced substantial growth, with a notable surge between 2019 and 2020. The United States leads in both publication volume and citation impact, reflecting its central role in advancing AI-driven innovations. Major journals such as Conclusion: AI in anesthesiology is entering a phase of rapid interdisciplinary expansion, integrating clinical needs with computational innovation. Future research should prioritize the clinical validation of AI tools, foster stronger collaboration between computer scientists and anesthesiologists, and address unresolved translational gaps such as model interpretability and cross-modal data fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.