ArticleWearable technologies2025
Feasibility assessment of textile electromyography sensors for a wearable telehealth biofeedback system.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intention Prediction for Active Upper-Limb Exoskeletons in Industrial Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Bioengineering Support in the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study investigated the efficacy and feasibility of screen-printed and ink-printed textile-based dry electrodes for electromyography (EMG) acquisition, marking a novel step in wearable telehealth (TH) system integration. We controlled the design and fabrication conditions of these textile EMG sensors, including electrode area and sizing, ensuring optimal contact pressure. Skin-electrode impedance for all designs was evaluated, and a 20 mm electrode diameter was deemed material-efficient and design-effective. When compared with standard 20 mm wet electrodes, our EMG sensors with the screen and inkjet-printed dry electrodes exhibited comparable signal-to-noise ratios (SNR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.