ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025
Magnetic resonance imaging of paraurethral and paravaginal lesion: relevant diagnoses, key findings and surgical correlation.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant vulvar inclusion cyst in a 50-year-old female: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paraurethral and paravaginal lesions are uncommon entities that often present diagnostic challenges due to their anatomical complexity, varied etiologies, and overlapping clinical presentations. Accurate identification and characterization of these lesions are essential for appropriate management and surgical planning. A structured diagnostic approach, based on clinical history, lesion location, and imaging features, is critical to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the modality of choice due to its excellent soft-tissue contrast, multiplanar capabilities, and non-invasive nature, offering superior delineation of lesion extent and relationship with adjacent pelvic structures. This pictorial review seeks to support radiologists and clinicians by offering a comprehensive yet practical guide to the imaging evaluation of paraurethral and paravaginal lesions. Through high-resolution MRI images and original anatomical illustrations, we aim to reduce the gap between imaging interpretation and clinical decision-making. We summarize the primary MRI indications for evaluating female urethral pathology, provide an overview of common and rare differential diagnoses, and highlight relevant MRI protocol considerations. Additionally, we include correlations with surgical findings when available, to enhance clinical applicability. Rather than providing an exhaustive catalog of entities, our focus is to promote standardized imaging assessment and highlight key anatomical and diagnostic considerations that may facilitate a more confident and informed multidisciplinary approach to these often-overlooked pelvic pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.