Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528999›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025

Cervical cancer patients' knowledge and experiences with palliative care - A qualitative study.

Jaclyn A Wall, Tamara Nix-Parker, Katherine Klein, Marie A Bakitas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaclyn A WallVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Richmond, VA, USA.
Tamara Nix-ParkerSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Katherine KleinVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Richmond, VA, USA.
Marie A BakitasSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There is limited research examining palliative care (PC) knowledge and experiences in patients with cervical cancer. As this may inform who may benefit from specialty PC services, we investigated PC awareness, perspectives, needs, and acceptability in this population. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of patients with newly diagnosed (<12 months) cervical cancer. Eligible patients were > 18 years old and English-speaking. Semi-structured interview topics included knowledge/perceptions of PC, knowledge/perceptions of hospice, and experiences with PC or hospice. Participants were then read a brief definition and overview of services provided by PC (education). We then explored perceptions of PC acceptability and timing. Interviews were deidentified, professionally transcribed, and coded. Codes were grouped into categories and themes. Results: Seventeen patients participated. Median age was 52, 64 % were white, all had insurance. 35 % had stage I disease, 17.6 % stage II, and 47 % stage III. Most had minimal PC knowledge (12/17, 70.6 %) but were aware of hospice (16/17, 94.1 %) and understood it as end-of-life care (10/17, 58.8 %). Following our education, most felt PC would be beneficial (13/17, 76.5 %), and favored early introduction in their care (11/17, 64.7 %). We identified four main themes: two pre-education (PC knowledge is lacking, hospice is well-understood and favorably viewed) and two post-education (PC would provide an unmet benefit, early PC is preferable). Conclusions: PC knowledge was limited. However, following brief education, most patients found it desirable and favored early integration. This highlights the need for further research on developing early PC initiatives for patients with cervical cancer.

Identifiers

PMID40528999
PMCPMC12171762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.