ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Screening for penicillin allergy in obstetric patients to optimize guideline directed therapy.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Impact and Management of Antibiotic Allergy in Pregnancy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the safety of penicillin allergy evaluation and testing in obstetric patients utilizing oral drug challenges with or without prior penicillin skin testing (PST) depending on characteristics of the patient's medication reaction, and to determine whether removal of the drug allergy label led to an increased use of guideline-recommended antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Design and Setting: This retrospective cohort study evaluated obstetric patients cared for at the University of Iowa Health Care who were identified as having a penicillin allergy label between June 1, 2021 and July 1, 2023. Patients: A total of 728 patients were identified to have a penicillin allergy and 299 patients were seen in the drug allergy clinic (DAC) for allergy evaluation. Results: Of patients seen in the DAC for allergy evaluation, 270 (90.3%) had their allergy de-labeled after undergoing an oral drug challenge with or without PST. No patients experienced an IgE-mediated anaphylactic reaction to an oral drug challenge. Patients received penicillin G more often for GBS prophylaxis during labor when they had their drug allergy removed in the DAC compared to those who were not seen for allergy evaluation (87.5% vs 24.5%, Conclusions: This study supports the safety of drug allergy testing in obstetric patients. Most patients are appropriate candidates for a direct oral challenge only or PST followed by an oral challenge. Identifying and testing penicillin allergic obstetric patients prior to delivery resulted in an increase in use of first-line guideline-recommended antibiotic prophylaxis for GBS during labor.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.