ArticleRadiology case reports2025
A novel multimodal approach to C2 vertebroplasty in the setting of osteolytic metastases: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image-guided vertebral augmentation effectively treats pathologic vertebral lesions, though managing pathology in the cervical spine presents unique challenges. Posterolateral approaches, while safer, require prone positioning that may not be feasible for all patients. Open anterolateral and transoral approaches increase infection risk and typically require general anesthesia. We present a novel multimodal anterolateral approach using ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and cone-beam CT for percutaneous C2 vertebral augmentation in a patient with metastatic lesions. A 72-year-old man with multiple myeloma presented with a C2 vertebral body lytic lesion at high risk for dislocation. Due to presence of a stabilizing cervical collar and the risk associated with prone positioning, vertebral augmentation access was limited. With the patient in supine position, we utilized cone-beam CT with overlay guidance to plan a right lateral trajectory. Ultrasound identified vital vasculature, enabling targeted hydrodissection to create a safe access path with real-time image-guidance. An 11G trocar needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance, with intermittent cone-beam CT adjustments to ensure precise placement. After confirming access to the right lateral mass of C2 via fluoroscopy, 3.5cc of PMMA cement was successfully injected without extravasation. The patient experienced no complications or neurologic deficits on follow-up and was cleared to remove the cervical collar 10 days postprocedure. This case demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of a multimodal anterolateral approach for C2 vertebral augmentation when conventional approaches are contraindicated. By integrating ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with advanced imaging, this technique offers a safe alternative for anatomically constrained patients while avoiding the risks associated with traditional approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.