ReviewJournal of chemical and engineering data2025
Achieving Reproducibility and Replicability of Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Simulations Using the Molecular Simulation Design Framework (MoSDeF).
Review in Journal of chemical and engineering data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GOPAL: A Water Model with Improved Thermodynamic Properties over a Large Pressure and Temperature Range Optimized Using Multistate Reweighting and Configuration Space Mapping.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Molecular Docking as a Key Driver of Biocontrol for Agri-Food Security.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular simulations are increasingly used to predict thermophysical properties and explore molecular-level phenomena beyond modern imaging techniques. To make these tools accessible to nonexperts, several open-source molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) codes have been developed. However, using these tools is challenging, and concerns about the validity and reproducibility of the simulation data persist. In 2017, Schappals et al. reported a benchmarking study involving several research groups independently performing MD and MC simulations using different software to predict densities of alkanes using common molecular mechanics force fields [J. Chem. Theory Comput.2017, 4270-4280]. Although the predicted densities were reasonably close (mostly within 1%), the data often fell outside of the combined statistical uncertainties of the different simulations. Schappals et al. concluded that there are unavoidable errors inherent to molecular simulations once a certain degree of complexity of the system is reached. The Molecular Simulation Design Framework (MoSDeF) is a workflow package designed to achieve TRUE (Transparent, Reproducible, Usable-by-others, and Extensible) simulation studies by standardizing the implementation of molecular models for various simulation engines. This work demonstrates that using MoSDeF to initialize a simulation workflow results in consistent predictions of system density, even while increasing model complexity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.