ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2025
Contrasting temporal dynamics of land surface temperature responses to different types of forest loss.
Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reforestation-induced aerosol cooling effects divergently modulated by various types of biogeophysical feedback.National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest loss impacts local climate through biophysical processes. However, our understanding of this impact remains limited due to the neglect of its temporal dynamics. Using a space-and-time scheme that incorporates a change-detection method, we assess the dynamics of land surface temperature (LST) responses to various forest-loss types. Globally, LST increased by 0.12 K one year after forest loss, followed by a decreasing trend of -0.14 K per decade. Deforestation driven by commodity production and urbanization results in persistent warming, while forest disturbances such as shifting agriculture, forestry, and fire trigger diverse response dynamics with significant spatial variation due to differences in subsequent vegetation recovery. These disturbances cause attenuated warming in low and mid-latitudes, while, in the boreal zone, contrasting dynamics are observed: shifting agriculture causes attenuated cooling, whereas forestry and fire result in enhanced cooling. In addition to amplifying the amplitude of the LST seasonal cycle, forest loss also shifts the seasonal phase, which has not been previously reported. These findings demonstrate that climate feedback from forest loss is climate specific, loss-type dependent, and time varying, providing new insights for the development of local climate policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.