ArticleBrain & spine2025
Impact of tumor size and peritumoral edema on outcomes and complications in anterior midline skull base meningiomas.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary Evaluation of Preoperative Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and CT Mass Effect in Relation to Pre-Excision Invasive Intracranial Pressure During Intracranial Tumor Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Topological feature-driven TabPFN model for prediction of enlarged hemorrhage and edema after tumor resection in meningiomas.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A single MRI scan contains sufficient imaging information for accurate prediction of meningioma growth risk.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical resection is the primary treatment for symptomatic anterior midline skull base meningiomas. Research question: This study evaluates the impact of tumor size and peritumoral edema on clinical outcome. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of 109 patients who underwent resection between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. Tumors were categorized as: size 1 (<30 mm), size 2 (30-50 mm), and size 3 (>50 mm). Peritumoral edema was classified as: type 1 (no edema), type 2 (edema diameter < tumor diameter), and type 3 (edema diameter > tumor diameter). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) at discharge, three months postoperatively, and at last follow-up. Additionally, complication rates were analyzed. Results: Patients with size 3 tumors had significantly worse KPS scores at discharge (50 %) than those with size 2 (70 %) or size 1 tumors (80 %; p < 0.0001). At three months, KPS differences remained significant (p = 0.0209). For size 3 tumors, KPS at discharge was significantly associated with edema: 90 % for no edema, 70 % for type 2 edema, and 50 % for type 3 edema (p = 0.0008). Complication rates were higher in size 2 and 3 tumors (35-37 %) compared to size 1 (14 %; p = 0.0330). Tumors with peritumoral edema had increased complication rates (35 %) versus those without (23 %; p = 0.2051). Discussion and conclusions: The combination of large tumor size and extensive peritumoral edema are associated with reduced early postoperative outcomes and higher complication rates. These findings underscore the importance of careful preoperative patient selection and tailored surgical strategies to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.