ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Trust of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Point-of-Care Ultrasound Among Pediatric Emergency Physicians.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stakeholder experience with artificial intelligence in healthcare: a bibliometric study of satisfaction, trust, acceptance, and patient engagement.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Children and adolescents' views on artificial intelligence in pediatric healthcare: a qualitative focus group study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Pediatric syncope in the emergency department: a risk-stratified diagnostic and disposition pathway.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- AI-Enhanced POCUS in Emergency Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) may improve many aspects of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for physicians. However, adoption of AI relies on physician trust. Our study seeks to understand factors influencing physician trust in AI-augmented POCUS. Methods: From November 2023 to April 2024, we conducted semistructured interviews with academic pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians who use POCUS. The interview guide was sensitized by Yang's proposed framework for user trust in AI and explored participants' perspectives on AI-augmented POCUS. We used template analysis to identify themes. Interviews continued until thematic sufficiency was achieved. Results: We interviewed 14 PEM physicians across career stages with varying POCUS experience. Participants named several specific aspects of POCUS where AI would be beneficial including image acquisition, image interpretation, and workflow enhancement. We identified themes related to 5 factors perceived as influential in physicians' trust in AI-augmented POCUS: (1) technological-AI-augmented POCUS must be reliable, accurate, transparent, and overridable by the physician; (2) contextual-The technology should be generalizable to the clinical population; (3) user-Each physician's clinical experience, comfort with POCUS, and experiences with technology affect their trust; (4) social/organizational-Endorsements by known colleagues, institutions, and national groups can engender trust although the organization or company creating the AI may have variable influence; (5) environmental-AI is everywhere, and there is subconscious use and acceptance. Conclusion: Technological, contextual, user-related, social, organizational, and environmental factors influenced emergency physician trust in AI-augmented POCUS. Understanding these factors is important for developing AI-augmented POCUS tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.