ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Functional family therapy across the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conducting Evaluations in the Context of Tertiary Prevention of Youth Crime: Reflections from the Youth Endowment Fund.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study examines the effectiveness of the Functional Family Therapy (FFT) program in Norway through the COVID-19 pandemic using archival data. Since Norway's national lockdowns imposed significant disruptions on program delivery, concerns arose regarding FFT's effectiveness during the public health emergency; however, this hypothesis remained untested. This exploratory study uses a multigroup quasi-experimental design by comparing clients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data includes 518 adolescents and their families referred to FFT for serious and persistent antisocial behavior. The mean age of the youth was 14.2 years and the representation between boys and girls was close to equal (49.4% girls). Statistical analyses showed that clients' attributes at admission remained stable, and FFT remained effective in bringing about behavioral improvements and risk reductions throughout the pandemic. Additionally, regression results suggested that older clients tended to have greater reductions in behavioral problems and risk levels before lockdowns; however, this age effect disappeared after the onset of COVID. Clients returning home from institutional care reported stronger behavioral gains, whereas those living in foster homes showed less favorable risk outcomes. Collectively, these results suggest that both the FFT target population and treatment outcomes remained stable despite disruptions in program delivery during the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.