Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528851›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A mixed methods exploration of the interrelationships among self-compassion, stress management, psychological capital, and life satisfaction in Chinese university students.

Ping Huang, Zhenxing Lin, BingRu Wang, Zhou Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ping HuangGraduate School, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenxing LinGraduate School, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
BingRu WangDepartment of Student Affairs, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhou DuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored the interrelationships between self-compassion, stress management, psychological capital (PsyCap), and life satisfaction among Chinese university students. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed. The quantitative phase involved 478 students from six universities, with data analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test hypothesized direct and indirect relationships among the variables. The qualitative phase included semi-structured interviews with a subsample of 30 participants. Results: SEM results indicated that self-compassion and stress management positively influenced life satisfaction, both directly and indirectly, with PsyCap (comprising resilience, optimism, and self-efficacy) acting as a key mediator. PsyCap was strongly associated with higher life satisfaction. Multi-group SEM analyses showed no significant gender differences in the relationships among the variables. Qualitative findings offered deeper insights into students' experiences, highlighting challenges in balancing self-compassion with cultural and academic pressures, and confirmed PsyCap's role as a protective factor. Discussion: The findings emphasize the importance of promoting self-compassion, adaptive stress management strategies, and psychological capital to enhance the well-being of university students, particularly in high-stress academic environments.

Indexed as

emotional resiliencelife satisfactionmixed-methodspsychological capitalself-compassionstress managementstructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID40528851
PMCPMC12170633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.