Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528849›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

"What is in a name?"-Definition of mental disorder in the last 50 years: a scoping review, according to the perspective of clinical psychology.

Donatella Rita Petretto, Alessandro Mura, Gian Pietro Carrogu, Luca Gaviano, Riccardo Atzori, Mattia Vacca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Definitions of "Mental Disorder" from DSM-III to DSM-5.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donatella Rita PetrettoDepartment of Education, Philosophy, Psychology, State University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Alessandro MuraDepartment of Education, Philosophy, Psychology, State University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Gian Pietro CarroguDepartment of Education, Philosophy, Psychology, State University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Luca GavianoDepartment of Education, Philosophy, Psychology, State University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Riccardo AtzoriDepartment of Education, Philosophy, Psychology, State University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Mattia VaccaDepartment of Education, Philosophy, Psychology, State University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since ancient times, and later in the 17th and 18th centuries, scholars have sought to classify mental disorders. However, it wasn't until the late 1970s, with the work of Spitzer and Endicott and the publication of the DSM-III, that a formal definition of mental disorder was established. Once this milestone was reached, a long and complex debate on the definition of mental disorder started. Here we aim to review such a debate, taking into consideration the papers that have proposed and/or investigated and discussed the various definitions of mental disorder over the past 50 years. Methods: We conducted the literature review via Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. The following inclusion criteria were established: papers on the definition of mental disorder, written in English. All study designs were eligible, including those that utilized qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as methodology or guideline reports. Results: The sorted papers ( Conclusion: We concluded that despite the complex and still ongoing debate on the topic, and the precious contributions from all the authors involved, a unique and agreed-upon definition of the concept of mental disorder is still far from being identified. Furthermore, even if the definitions proposed by the international diagnostic manuals (especially by the DSM) constitutes an undeniable landmark, such definitions resulted to be more the outcome of various discussions, than the fruit of a shared consensus. The construct of mental disorder and its shared definition remain a critical theme in psychopathology.

Indexed as

clinical psychologydefinitionDSMmental disordertheoretical framework

Identifiers

PMID40528849
PMCPMC12171321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.