ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
"What is in a name?"-Definition of mental disorder in the last 50 years: a scoping review, according to the perspective of clinical psychology.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Definitions of "Mental Disorder" from DSM-III to DSM-5.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From "Mental/Psychological Disorder" and/or "Individual Pattern of Adaptation" Toward "Developmental Trajectories During the Lifespan".Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since ancient times, and later in the 17th and 18th centuries, scholars have sought to classify mental disorders. However, it wasn't until the late 1970s, with the work of Spitzer and Endicott and the publication of the DSM-III, that a formal definition of mental disorder was established. Once this milestone was reached, a long and complex debate on the definition of mental disorder started. Here we aim to review such a debate, taking into consideration the papers that have proposed and/or investigated and discussed the various definitions of mental disorder over the past 50 years. Methods: We conducted the literature review via Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. The following inclusion criteria were established: papers on the definition of mental disorder, written in English. All study designs were eligible, including those that utilized qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as methodology or guideline reports. Results: The sorted papers ( Conclusion: We concluded that despite the complex and still ongoing debate on the topic, and the precious contributions from all the authors involved, a unique and agreed-upon definition of the concept of mental disorder is still far from being identified. Furthermore, even if the definitions proposed by the international diagnostic manuals (especially by the DSM) constitutes an undeniable landmark, such definitions resulted to be more the outcome of various discussions, than the fruit of a shared consensus. The construct of mental disorder and its shared definition remain a critical theme in psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.