ArticlePain reports2025
Brivaracetam for spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain: results of a pilot double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to Abudayeh and Fishchenko.Pain reports · 2026Article
- Postrandomization analgesic escalation and interpretability of spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain trials.Pain reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Assess feasibility, safety, and tolerability of 3 months of oral brivaracetam for severe (9-10/10) spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain. Methods: We conducted a multisite pilot study where adults were randomized to 3 months of brivaracetam (100 mg BID) or placebo. Pain was assessed via the Brief Pain Inventory, the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Dataset (version 2.0), and a daily pain diary. Results: We enrolled 24 participants across 2 sites and 14 participants were included in the final analysis (n = 8 placebo, n = 6 brivaracetam). The drug was tolerated with expected, nonserious side effects (nausea if taken on an empty stomach, fatigue that improved after 2-3 days). Side effects were more common in the brivaracetam group (73%, n = 8 vs 33%, n = 3). We observed a mean 2.7-point reduction in daily worst pain in the brivaracetam group compared to a 1.0-point reduction in the placebo group. The percentage of participants experiencing 30% (100% vs 60%) and 50% (60% vs 12.5%) pain reduction was greater in the brivaracetam group. Conclusions: These findings suggest safety, tolerability, and feasibility of brivaracetam for treating neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. These pilot findings will be used to power future efficacy clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.