Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528740›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

Old player, new roles: defining the role of the plastidial phosphorylase.

David Seung, Slawomir Orzechowski, Joerg Fettke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David SeungJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3905-3647
Slawomir OrzechowskiBiochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biology, SGGW, 159 Nowoursynowska Street, Warsaw, 02-776, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-6910
Joerg FettkeBiopolymer Analytics, Institute of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknechtstr. 24/25, Potsdam, 14476, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-7611

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X01097X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X011003/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plastidial phosphorylase (Pho1 or Phs1; E.C. 2.4.1.1) is a ubiquitous enzyme among plants that catalyzes the formation and degradation of glucans. Although the first report connecting Pho1 with starch metabolism came out > 80 years ago, its precise role is still a matter of debate. In this article, we evaluate the catalytic and regulatory mechanisms of Pho1 in the context of known mechanisms in its animal, fungal, and bacteria homologs. We further discuss recent breakthroughs in understanding Pho1's function in initiating starch granule formation. This role is relevant to both photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic tissues, as loss of Pho1 affects the regulation of the number of transitory starch granules in Arabidopsis leaves under various metabolic contexts, as well as the number of storage starch granules and/or starch granule morphology in wheat endosperm and potato tubers. Our comparison of phosphorylases across kingdoms reveals several regulatory mechanisms that require further investigation in plants. We also discuss emerging research on Pho1 protein interactions that give rise to other metabolic processes, such as photosynthesis. Overall, these multiple emerging roles of phosphorylase emphasize its importance in plant metabolism and its broad potential as a target for crop improvement.

Indexed as

PhosphorylasesPlastidsPlant ProteinsStarchPhosphorylasesPlant ProteinsStarchglucan phosphorylasePho1Phs1plastidial phosphorylasestarchstarch initiationstarch metabolism

Identifiers

PMID40528740
PMCPMC12267944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.