ArticleUrology research & practice2025
Optimized Surgical Outcomes in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience with 250 Cases Using a Novel Technique.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has become a standard of care for living kidney donors, providing reduced morbidity, quicker recovery, and enhanced patient satisfaction compared with open techniques. This study evaluates a modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique designed to minimize colon mobilization while optimizing visualization, thereby improving donor outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 250 consecutive living donor nephrectomies performed by a single surgeon between March 2022 and March 2024 was conducted. All donors underwent preoperative imaging (3D computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography). The modified approach avoided splenic flexure dissection and introduced early ligation of the adrenal vein. We analyzed intraoperative parameters (operative time, estimated blood loss, complications) and postoperative measures (hospital stay, pain scores, complication rates, satisfaction) were analyzed. Results: The mean operative time was 72.8 ± 16.2 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 100 ± 40 mL. No conversions to open surgery or intraoperative transfusions were required. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.0 days. Postoperative pain (mean Visual Analog Scale [VAS] 2.5 ± 1.8) was low, and major vascular injury occurred in 0.8% of cases. Wound infection and incisional hernia rates were each 0.8%. Patient satisfaction was high (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire [PSQ] 3.3 ± 1.4), indicating favorable perceptions of comfort and outcomes. Conclusion: This modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique is safe, effective, and associated with enhanced patient comfort and reduced complications. The findings underscore its potential to improve donor experiences, potentially expanding the living donor pool. Further investigations should confirm these outcomes over a longer follow-up period.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.