ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2025
Enhancing Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Acute Care: A Qualitative Case Study of Nurses' Roles, Interprofessional Collaboration, and Professional Development.
Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Producing Evidence-Based Care: Nurses' and Patients' Lived Experiences in Long-Term Condition Management.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Promoting evidence-based nursing through collaboration, autonomy, and agency: A qualitative case study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Evidence-Based Practice Attributes Among Specialist Nurses in Acute Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Organisational contextual drivers of evidence-based practice across acute and primary care.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and PurposeEvidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality. However, its implementation in acute care remains inconsistent due to organisational hierarchies, professional silos, and limited access to continuous professional development (CPD). Nurses play a key role in translating research into practice but often encounter barriers that limit their ability to lead EBP initiatives. Interprofessional collaboration and CPD are recognised enablers of EBP, yet their impact in acute care requires further investigation. This study explores how interprofessional collaboration, nurse-led initiatives, and CPD influence EBP adoption.Methods and ProceduresA collective qualitative case study was conducted across two acute care hospitals in the East Midlands, England. Data collection included 25 semi-structured interviews, nonparticipant observations, and document analysis over six years, with an intensive fieldwork phase in 2022. Thematic analysis was used to identify key patterns related to EBP adoption, interprofessional collaboration, and nurse-led knowledge implementation.ResultsNurses actively advocated for EBP integration but often worked independently due to the absence of formal collaboration structures. Interprofessional collaboration facilitated knowledge-sharing and decision-making, yet hierarchical constraints limited nurses' influence in clinical governance. CPD enhanced nurses' confidence and ability to challenge outdated practices, but disparities in access led to inconsistent EBP engagement across nursing teams.ConclusionStructured CPD, interdisciplinary collaboration, and inclusive decision-making are essential for EBP adoption. Addressing hierarchical constraints and resource limitations is crucial for sustaining evidence-driven care. Future research should explore the long-term sustainability of EBP implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.