Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528645›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2025

Translation, Adaptation, and Criterion Validation of the Family Caregiver Assessment Tool for French-Speaking Cardiovascular Patients in Canada (FAM-CAM-Fr).

Tanya Mailhot, Zineb Bouaouina, Imène Khetir, Céline Gélinas, Judith Brouillette, Claudie Roussy, Stéphanie Jarry, Patrick Lavoie

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanya MailhotMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-4955
Zineb BouaouinaMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Imène KhetirMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Céline GélinasDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Judith BrouilletteMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Claudie RoussyMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Stéphanie JarryFaculty of Nursing and Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Patrick LavoieMontreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-6484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDelirium is a common yet underdiagnosed condition in hospitalized older adults, particularly challenging to detect early in cardiology settings. Although delirium assessment tools improve detection rates, observations by family caregivers of patients' cognitive changes can offer valuable insights, supplementing assessments by healthcare professionals. However, validated French-language tools for family caregivers to assess delirium in acute care settings in Canada are lacking.PurposeTranslate, culturally adapt, and validate the Family Confusion Assessment Method for French-speaking cardiovascular patients and their caregivers (FAM-CAM-Fr).MethodsThe translation and cultural adaptation of the FAM-CAM were conducted following the guidelines of Sousa and Rojjanasrirat (2011). Criterion validation involved 100 dyads of family caregivers and hospitalized cardiovascular patients. The FAM-CAM-Fr's performance was assessed by comparing it to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for delirium. Measures of sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with the CAM were calculated.ResultsThe FAM-CAM-Fr showed high specificity (92.6%) but low sensitivity (58%) in detecting delirium. Cohen's Kappa indicated a moderate agreement (>0.50) between the FAM-CAM-Fr and the CAM. Despite family caregivers using the tool without prior training, indicating its usability in real-world settings, sensitivity was lower compared to studies that included caregiver training, though specificity was similar.ConclusionThe FAM-CAM-Fr is promising as a specific tool for screening delirium in cardiovascular patients. Despite its low sensitivity, its high specificity indicates that it is effective at ruling out delirium. Future research should focus on further validation across various settings.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCaregiversDeliriumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTranslationscardiovascular patientscaregiver-supported screeningcultural adaptationDelirium detectionFAM-CAM-Frfamily-centered delirium assessment

Identifiers

PMID40528645
PMCPMC12344204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.