Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528565›Full record

ReviewAnatomical sciences education2025

A new classmate in anatomy education: 3D anatomical modeling medical students' engagement on learning through self-prepared anatomical models.

Muhiddin Furkan Kılıç, Afife Zehra Yurtsever, Feyza Açıkgöz, Beste Başgut, Burcu Mavi, Ezgihan Ertuç, Sinem Sevim, Tuhan Oruk, Yavuz Selim Kıyak, Tuncay Peker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muhiddin Furkan KılıçFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-6816
Afife Zehra YurtseverFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-9867
Feyza AçıkgözFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-8480
Beste BaşgutFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-8545
Burcu MaviFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2330-3819
Ezgihan ErtuçFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-3223
Sinem SevimFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9632-6085
Tuhan OrukFaculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-633X
Yavuz Selim KıyakDepartment of Medical Education and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-3234
Tuncay PekerDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4839-7839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional education often relies on passive learning approaches, whereas modern medical students increasingly seek interactive, technology-enhanced experiences. Despite the growing use of digital tools in anatomy education, there remains a lack of structured, student-centered 3D modeling courses embedded within the undergraduate medical curriculum. Guided by constructivist learning theory and emphasizing student co-creation, we designed the "Anatomical 3D Modeling Workshop", enabling students to create, visualize, and interact with anatomical models through 3D modeling, 3D printing, and virtual reality (VR). About 29 voluntary preclinical medical students participated in a 16-week elective course where they actively built anatomical models using professional software, produced medical animations, and experienced their creations in VR. Physical 3D prints of selected models were also produced. Outcomes were assessed through pre- and post-workshop anatomy exam scores and a questionnaire. Although exam scores demonstrated a nonsignificant post-workshop improvement, students reported substantial benefits, including stress and anxiety reduction and enhanced motivation, valuing the opportunity to co-create educational materials. They also highlighted the workshop's contribution to their professional development. Embedding student-centered and technology-driven strategies into anatomy education could reduce stress and anxiety. The Anatomical 3D Modeling Workshop demonstrates the potential of integrating active, hands-on approaches to transform medical education and better align with the expectations of learners.

Indexed as

AnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, AnatomicStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearningMalePrinting, Three-DimensionalProblem-Based LearningSurveys and QuestionnairesVirtual Reality3D anatomical modelinganatomy educationanxietycurriculumrapid prototypingstudent satisfactionvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40528565
PMCPMC12222579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.