ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Inclusive housing for people with disability: process evaluation of the 'Down to 10 Days' campaign.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health-promoting housing policy in a changing climate: integrating affordability, security, and resilience.Health promotion international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Down to 10 Days campaign was an advocacy initiative aimed at reducing long delays in housing approvals under Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), a federal self-directed funding program for people with disability. Delays in securing appropriate housing often resulted in prolonged hospital stays or inappropriate placements, significantly impacting individuals' well-being and independence. The campaign, led by a coalition of disability and advocacy organizations, sought to streamline NDIS approval processes, targeting a reduction in decision times to 10 days. A process evaluation systematically examines a program or campaign's implementation, assessing whether activities were delivered as intended and identifying factors influencing success. It is particularly valuable in advocacy, offering insights into campaign effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, and short- and long-term outcomes. A process evaluation utilizing Kotter's eight-Step Change Model, incorporating document analysis (n = 42) and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (n = 6), was undertaken to assess the campaign's implementation and effectiveness. The use of clear messaging, targeted political advocacy, and public engagement strategies contributed to the campaign's reach and influence. Key short-term successes included heightened awareness, improved government transparency regarding NDIS decision timelines, and commitments to process improvements. This evaluation underscores the importance of strategic advocacy, coalition-building, and evidence-based messaging in driving policy change. The findings provide valuable insights for future campaigns seeking to enhance disability services and social policy reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.