Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528529›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Inclusive housing for people with disability: process evaluation of the 'Down to 10 Days' campaign.

Ali Lakhani, Di Winkler, Ruth Mackenzie-Stewart, Jessica Walker, Deniz Senyel, Rwth Stuckey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali LakhaniSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 360 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3209-7831
Di WinklerResearch and Innovation, Summer Foundation, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia.
Ruth Mackenzie-StewartSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 360 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0211-2685
Jessica WalkerResearch and Innovation, Summer Foundation, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia.
Deniz SenyelSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 360 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Rwth StuckeySchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 360 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Funding

The Summer Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Down to 10 Days campaign was an advocacy initiative aimed at reducing long delays in housing approvals under Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), a federal self-directed funding program for people with disability. Delays in securing appropriate housing often resulted in prolonged hospital stays or inappropriate placements, significantly impacting individuals' well-being and independence. The campaign, led by a coalition of disability and advocacy organizations, sought to streamline NDIS approval processes, targeting a reduction in decision times to 10 days. A process evaluation systematically examines a program or campaign's implementation, assessing whether activities were delivered as intended and identifying factors influencing success. It is particularly valuable in advocacy, offering insights into campaign effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, and short- and long-term outcomes. A process evaluation utilizing Kotter's eight-Step Change Model, incorporating document analysis (n = 42) and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (n = 6), was undertaken to assess the campaign's implementation and effectiveness. The use of clear messaging, targeted political advocacy, and public engagement strategies contributed to the campaign's reach and influence. Key short-term successes included heightened awareness, improved government transparency regarding NDIS decision timelines, and commitments to process improvements. This evaluation underscores the importance of strategic advocacy, coalition-building, and evidence-based messaging in driving policy change. The findings provide valuable insights for future campaigns seeking to enhance disability services and social policy reforms.

Indexed as

HousingInsurance, DisabilityPersons with DisabilitiesAustraliaHumansProgram Evaluationdisabilityhousingprocess evaluationself-directed funding

Identifiers

PMID40528529
PMCPMC12203791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.