Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528512›Full record

ArticleNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2026

Physiological barriers to oral intake in survivors of critical illness: A scoping review.

Breanna J Teleki, Elizabeth Viner Smith, Amy Freeman-Sanderson, Rosalie Yandell, Lee-Anne S Chapple

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Breanna J TelekiCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9692-1962
Elizabeth Viner SmithAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-251X
Amy Freeman-SandersonGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosalie YandellCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Lee-Anne S ChappleAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9818-2484

Funding

Amy Freeman-Sanderson has salary support from a National Health and Medical Research Council NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral nutrition is the predominant mode of nutrition delivery on the post-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) ward; yet, it is associated with lower intake than via enteral or parenteral nutrition. There are limited data on barriers that influence oral intake in ICU survivors. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to map and describe physiological nutrition-impacting symptoms following ICU discharge. Database searches of MEDLINE, Emcare, and CINAHL identified primary research in English that included adult patients eating orally throughout the post-ICU period. Data were extracted on study design, aim, population, post-ICU setting, and the physiological nutrition-impacting symptoms reported, including method of reporting and symptom prevalence. Twenty-nine studies comprising between 11 and 357 participants were included, most of which were prospective and observational in design. Post-ICU settings varied and were inclusive of acute care wards (n = 7, 23%), rehabilitation facilities (n = 5, 16%), and various timepoints following hospital discharge (n = 19, 61%). Key physiological nutrition-impacting symptoms reported were dysphagia (n = 25, 86%) and poor appetite (n = 10, 34%). Other common symptoms included early satiety, fatigue, and nausea. Variations occurred in both the method used to quantify symptoms and the prevalence of each symptom across isolated timepoints. The proportion of patients reporting at least one nutrition-impacting symptom at each time point was 16%-78% on the acute care ward, 29%-95% in rehabilitation facilities, and 10%-71% following hospital discharge. Further studies are required to determine which symptoms ICU survivors experience and their trajectory and impact on oral intake.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEatingSurvivorsAppetiteCritical CareDeglutition DisordersFatigueHumansIntensive Care UnitsNauseaadultcritical carelife cyclelong‐term carenutritionrehabilitationresearch and diseases

Identifiers

PMID40528512
PMCPMC12982631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.