ArticleUrology research & practice2025
A Low-Cost Gelatin-Based Model for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Renal Access.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a low-cost and reproducible training model using gelatin that can be useful for acquiring the necessary skills for successful ultrasound-guided access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy without exposing patients to clinical risks. Methods: A prospective and analytical study involving 12 urology residents was conducted to validate the model using content and construct validation systems. The study consisted of 2 parts: content validation through expert opinion surveys and construct validation through resident skill assessments before and after training on the model. This model imitates the calyx to puncture and was developed using pitted olives in dense gelatin. The model was constructed for a total cost of $29.7 per unit with an easy and reproducible construction. Each model can be used to perform approximately 40 punctures before the image quality deteriorates. Results: Globally, this training model increased skills. Puncture time decreased from 106 to 40.5 seconds after training (P = .002). The study found that the model was accepted by 71.4% of urologists as a safe training alternative and provided a risk-free environment for practicing the 2 skills required for a successful puncture: adjusting the ultrasound machine for an adequate image of the target and surrounding tissues and needle-probe alignment. Conclusion: This model is easy to build, reproducible, and cost-effective. It enhances the residents' skills to increase success and safety when performing ultrasound-guided percutaneous access.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.