Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528355›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025

Nontargeted Analysis of Surface and Groundwaters Impacted by Historic PFAS Waste Sites.

Heather D Whitehead, Timothy J Buckley, Jon R Sobus, Jacqueline Bangma, Denise K MacMillan, Antony J Williams, Gregory Janesch, James Coombs, Erin Newman, Andri Dahlmeier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Heather D WhiteheadU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-604X
Timothy J BuckleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5128-4643
Jon R SobusU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Jacqueline BangmaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Denise K MacMillanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Antony J WilliamsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-4821
Gregory JaneschU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-1655-9479
James CoombsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Erin NewmanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, Illinois 60604, United States.
Andri DahlmeierMinnesota Pollution Control Agency, St Paul, Minnesota 55155, United States.
Stefan SaraviaMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota 55164, United States.
Rosie RushingMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota 55164, United States.
Marla DeVaultMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota 55164, United States.
James P McCordU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1780-4916

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) make up a diverse class of anthropogenic chemicals with widespread industrial and commercial uses. Historical manufacturing and disposal of PFAS have led to their introduction to the environment, although only a fraction of existing PFAS are routinely monitored using targeted analysis methods. Here, nontargeted analysis was used to investigate the identity and fate of PFAS present in eight groundwater and nine surface water samples collected near St. Paul, MN, surrounding two sites that historically received wastes from a PFAS manufacturer in the 1940-1970s. A total of 210 PFAS, split across 33 different homologous series, were identified in surface and groundwater samples both at and downstream of the two waste sites. Identified compounds included perfluorinated, polyfluorinated, and unsaturated sulfonic and carboxylic acid species as well as a variety of sulfonamide and sulfonamido chemistries. PFAS measured downgradient included legacy perfluorinated sulfonic and carboxylic acids, as well as their polyfluorinated, unsaturated, keto, and ether-containing analogs. Two-thirds of the identified PFAS were unique to the groundwater at one site. The lack of these PFAS at downstream sites likely reflects dilution below the limit of detection during downgradient transport. The identified species reveal previously unknown and substantial ongoing contamination of the watershed due to historic PFAS manufacturing and waste disposal.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsGroundwaterEnvironmental MonitoringWater Pollutants, ChemicalFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemicalgroundwaterhazardous waste sitenontargeted analysisPFASsurface water

Identifiers

PMID40528355
PMCPMC13087888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.