Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40528297›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Repetition Hampers Flexible Object Manipulation Under Visual Uncertainty.

Catherine Anne Sager, Ian Greenhouse, Michelle Marneweck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Hybrid virtual reality object lifting matches real-world object lifting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine Anne SagerDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7224-6522
Ian GreenhouseDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Michelle MarneweckDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3953-5956

Funding

MRF_ #4412T0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seemingly simple actions, like reaching for and lifting an object, involve the coordination of distinct neural pathways within the dorsal and ventral streams. These components can be differentially affected by repetition-induced anterograde interference, where extensive practice on one task impairs performance on subsequent tasks. Repetition leads to rigid movement patterns, making it harder to adapt flexibly to new situations, especially in tasks with sensory uncertainty that require the brain to rely more on past experiences (i.e., sensorimotor memories). To explore this, we tested whether object-use tasks, which depend on the ventral stream, are more affected by this interference than a simpler reach-to-button task with helpful visual cues. Participants completed two tasks: a reach-to-button task involving pressing buttons on either side of a symmetrical object and an object-use task where the same object had a hidden, asymmetric center of mass (CoM). To measure interference, we manipulated how many times participants lifted the object with the weight on one side before switching it to the other side. Our results showed that interference was strongest in the object-use task, where uncertain visual information forced participants to rely on sensorimotor memories. In contrast, the reach-to-button task, supported by helpful visual cues, showed no significant interference. This suggests that tasks relying on the ventral stream are more vulnerable to interference, particularly when sensory feedback is unclear. Our findings highlight how repetition affects different movement types and emphasize the need for a balance between repetition and flexibility in motor learning.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleUncertaintyYoung Adultanterograde interferencemotor controlrepetitionvisual uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40528297
PMCPMC12174497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.