ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Repetition Hampers Flexible Object Manipulation Under Visual Uncertainty.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid virtual reality object lifting matches real-world object lifting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seemingly simple actions, like reaching for and lifting an object, involve the coordination of distinct neural pathways within the dorsal and ventral streams. These components can be differentially affected by repetition-induced anterograde interference, where extensive practice on one task impairs performance on subsequent tasks. Repetition leads to rigid movement patterns, making it harder to adapt flexibly to new situations, especially in tasks with sensory uncertainty that require the brain to rely more on past experiences (i.e., sensorimotor memories). To explore this, we tested whether object-use tasks, which depend on the ventral stream, are more affected by this interference than a simpler reach-to-button task with helpful visual cues. Participants completed two tasks: a reach-to-button task involving pressing buttons on either side of a symmetrical object and an object-use task where the same object had a hidden, asymmetric center of mass (CoM). To measure interference, we manipulated how many times participants lifted the object with the weight on one side before switching it to the other side. Our results showed that interference was strongest in the object-use task, where uncertain visual information forced participants to rely on sensorimotor memories. In contrast, the reach-to-button task, supported by helpful visual cues, showed no significant interference. This suggests that tasks relying on the ventral stream are more vulnerable to interference, particularly when sensory feedback is unclear. Our findings highlight how repetition affects different movement types and emphasize the need for a balance between repetition and flexibility in motor learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.