ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Effect of an Online Educational Program on Nurses' Knowledge of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of an Online Educational Program on Nurses' Knowledge of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.International wound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid online education is essential to equip nurses with new knowledge, such as how to care for incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). We evaluated the effect of an online educational program on nurses' knowledge of IAD through a pretest-posttest study, examining how it changed nurses' IAD knowledge. Our 15-item knowledge test contained four categories: 1. IAD pathophysiology, 2. IAD identification and management, 3. Differences between IAD and pressure injuries, and 4. Visual vignettes. We recruited 73 nurses from January 2022 to October 2022 in a Singapore tertiary hospital. Mean baseline IAD knowledge was low, 8.19 out of 15. Mean overall knowledge improved significantly from 8.19 to 9.51 post-test (Mean difference = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.73-1.90, p < 0.001), reflecting a 30% increase in the proportion of participants with moderate to high knowledge after the program. Participants also improved in their IAD identification and management knowledge (Mean difference = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40-1.00, p < 0.001). Our study found that an online program enhanced nurses' overall knowledge of IAD, especially in its identification and management. Combining an online program with other modes of learning, for example, face-to-face trainings, might result in a greater understanding of this skin injury. Our findings further highlight the importance of clinical experience, first-hand practicums and regular trainings in consolidating nurses' IAD knowledge. Computer-assisted instruction; education, nursing; incontinence-associated dermatitis; knowledge; online learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.